๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐- ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ฒ, ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐
Today was yet another remarkable day at the Ethiopian National Dialogue Conference, a day that vividly demonstrated the seriousness, discipline, and historic significance of this national undertaking. Delegates representing the groups of fifty, through their designated spokespeople, reported to the larger assembly of 250 delegates across the eight agenda areas.
Their presentations reflected not only the majority and minority positions that had emerged from deep deliberation, but also the careful SWOT analysisโstrengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threatsโthat had been used to test and support those positions.
What unfolded was more than a procedural exercise; it was a powerful display of analytical rigor, critical thinking, balanced representation, and genuine openness to better ideas.
The quality of the presentations revealed a process grounded in reason rather than rhetoric, substance rather than slogans. Delegates did not simply repeat fixed positions; they engaged with the complexities of each issue, acknowledged areas of disagreement, and presented nuanced perspectives with fairness and respect.
The inclusion of minority views alongside majority positions was especially significant, because it showed a commitment to honesty, inclusivity, and intellectual integrity. This was not the language of victory over others, but the language of shared responsibility and national reflection.
๐
๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐, ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ซ๐ค๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ ๐ง๐๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฒ. ๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ญ, ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ญ๐ก ๐จ๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐, ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ, ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐, ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ฐ๐๐ฅ.
What is emerging before our eyes is not merely a conference process, but a solemn commitment to a shared destinyโa collective determination to build a stronger, more united, prosperous and more hopeful Ethiopia.
In that sense, the National Dialogue Conference is doing more than discussing and debating the countryโs problems. It is helping to redefine the political culture of the nation itself. It is teaching that difference need not mean division, that disagreement need not lead to destruction, and that a people committed to one another can still choose to rise together, to live peacefully as brothers and sisters in the Land of Origins, the Cradle of Humanity.
That is the spirit of a new Ethiopia: one shaped not by endless confrontation, but by the courage to listen, the wisdom to compromise, and the will to build a common future.
In a nation marked by historical grievances, competing narratives, and deep questions about identity and governance, the emergence of convergence on the eight agenda issues is both significant and encouraging. It shows that despite differences in background, ideology, and political experience, Ethiopians can still find common ground when they are given the space to speak, listen, and reason together in good faith.
The eight agenda issues brought before the conference are not ordinary topics. They touch the core of Ethiopiaโs national life: the structure of the state, citizenship, historical grievances, transitional justice, federalism, power-sharing, electoral systems, and the relationship between religion and the state, among others.
These issues have long-shaped public debate and, in many cases, intensified division. For that reason, reaching convergence on them requires more than political compromise. It requires patience, honesty, mutual respect, and a sincere commitment to the national interest.
What makes the current dialogue remarkable is the gradual movement from scattered views toward shared understanding. The current dialogue is showing a striking transformation, moving dynamically from fragmented perspectives into a cohesive shared framework through organic convergence. Delegates begin with different experiences and often different interpretations of Ethiopiaโs problems. Some speak from the pain of exclusion; others from concern over national unity; still others from legal, institutional, or historical perspectives.
Yet through structured discussion, careful listening, and expert guidance, these separate perspectives begin to overlap. As delegates hear one another more fully, they discover not only disagreement, but also many shared concerns: peace, dignity, justice, equality, stability, and a better future for the next generation.
Convergence does not mean that all differences disappear. Rather, it means that people identify enough common purpose to move forward together. In the Ethiopian National Dialogue Conference, convergence is emerging through the recognition that Ethiopiaโs problems cannot be solved by force, denial, or exclusion. They require dialogue, consensus, and the willingness to place the national good above narrow advantage.
This shift in thinking is one of the most important outcomes of the conference. It signals that Ethiopians are beginning to move from confrontation toward cooperation.
To me, the eight agenda issues also reveal how deeply interconnected Ethiopiaโs challenges are. Questions of governance cannot be separated from questions of justice. Debates over federalism cannot be detached from questions of identity and representation. Electoral systems are tied to trust in institutions, and transitional justice is linked to healing historical wounds.
๐๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ง๐๐๐ญ๐๐, ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ง ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ. ๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ญ๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ, ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ฌ, ๐ซ๐๐๐จ๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ณ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ. ๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ, ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ญ๐ก ๐ญ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.
Another important aspect of convergence is the role of expert input. I am privileged to be designated a subject matter expert in various areas. The role of experts is to help clarify technical matters, correct misunderstandings, and provide context that broadens the delegatesโ thinking. Their contribution allows the conference to move beyond slogans and toward practical solutions.
When delegates are better informed, they are more capable of finding durable agreements. This is especially important in a national dialogue, where the issues are complex and the consequences of poor decisions are serious. It is not the job of experts to shape opinions, present preferred solutions or try to influence the delegates directly or indirectly in one or more directions or outcomes.
The emergence of convergence at the conference also reflects a deeper civic lesson. It shows that democracy is not only about winning arguments. It is also about listening carefully, adjusting oneโs position, and building collective purpose.
In this sense, the dialogue conference is helping to cultivate a political culture based on reason, humility, and shared responsibility. Such a culture is essential for Ethiopiaโs future. Without it, divisions may persist. With it, the country can begin to heal and rebuild.
Ultimately, convergence on the eight agenda issues is not merely a procedural achievement. It is a symbol of national possibility. It demonstrates that Ethiopians, despite years of mistrust and conflict, are capable of reaching across differences and working toward a common future.
If this spirit continues, the National Dialogue Conference may become one of the most important turning points in Ethiopiaโs modern history. It can help lay the foundation for peace, justice, and a more inclusive political order.
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ ๐. ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ: ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐๐๐ฒโ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ฐโ๐ฌ ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐.
๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ญ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ง ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐จ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฒ, ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐, ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ฉ๐ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐๐ญ๐ก ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ.
Posted originally on X (Twitter):
https://x.com/AlMariam1/status/2081944459789418658
๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐- ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ฒ, ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐
Today was yet another remarkable day at the Ethiopian National Dialogue Conference, a day that vividly demonstrated the seriousness, discipline, and historic significance of this national undertaking. Delegates representing the groups of fifty, through their designated spokespeople, reported to the larger assembly of 250 delegates across the eight agenda areas.
Their presentations reflected not only the majority and minority positions that had emerged from deep deliberation, but also the careful SWOT analysisโstrengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threatsโthat had been used to test and support those positions.
What unfolded was more than a procedural exercise; it was a powerful display of analytical rigor, critical thinking, balanced representation, and genuine openness to better ideas.
The quality of the presentations revealed a process grounded in reason rather than rhetoric, substance rather than slogans. Delegates did not simply repeat fixed positions; they engaged with the complexities of each issue, acknowledged areas of disagreement, and presented nuanced perspectives with fairness and respect.
The inclusion of minority views alongside majority positions was especially significant, because it showed a commitment to honesty, inclusivity, and intellectual integrity. This was not the language of victory over others, but the language of shared responsibility and national reflection.
๐ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐, ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐๐๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง: ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ซ๐ค๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ ๐ง๐๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฒ. ๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ญ, ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ข๐๐๐ข๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ญ๐ก ๐จ๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐, ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ, ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง. ๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐, ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ฐ๐๐ฅ.
What is emerging before our eyes is not merely a conference process, but a solemn commitment to a shared destinyโa collective determination to build a stronger, more united, prosperous and more hopeful Ethiopia.
In that sense, the National Dialogue Conference is doing more than discussing and debating the countryโs problems. It is helping to redefine the political culture of the nation itself. It is teaching that difference need not mean division, that disagreement need not lead to destruction, and that a people committed to one another can still choose to rise together, to live peacefully as brothers and sisters in the Land of Origins, the Cradle of Humanity.
That is the spirit of a new Ethiopia: one shaped not by endless confrontation, but by the courage to listen, the wisdom to compromise, and the will to build a common future.
In a nation marked by historical grievances, competing narratives, and deep questions about identity and governance, the emergence of convergence on the eight agenda issues is both significant and encouraging. It shows that despite differences in background, ideology, and political experience, Ethiopians can still find common ground when they are given the space to speak, listen, and reason together in good faith.
The eight agenda issues brought before the conference are not ordinary topics. They touch the core of Ethiopiaโs national life: the structure of the state, citizenship, historical grievances, transitional justice, federalism, power-sharing, electoral systems, and the relationship between religion and the state, among others.
These issues have long-shaped public debate and, in many cases, intensified division. For that reason, reaching convergence on them requires more than political compromise. It requires patience, honesty, mutual respect, and a sincere commitment to the national interest.
What makes the current dialogue remarkable is the gradual movement from scattered views toward shared understanding. The current dialogue is showing a striking transformation, moving dynamically from fragmented perspectives into a cohesive shared framework through organic convergence. Delegates begin with different experiences and often different interpretations of Ethiopiaโs problems. Some speak from the pain of exclusion; others from concern over national unity; still others from legal, institutional, or historical perspectives.
Yet through structured discussion, careful listening, and expert guidance, these separate perspectives begin to overlap. As delegates hear one another more fully, they discover not only disagreement, but also many shared concerns: peace, dignity, justice, equality, stability, and a better future for the next generation.
Convergence does not mean that all differences disappear. Rather, it means that people identify enough common purpose to move forward together. In the Ethiopian National Dialogue Conference, convergence is emerging through the recognition that Ethiopiaโs problems cannot be solved by force, denial, or exclusion. They require dialogue, consensus, and the willingness to place the national good above narrow advantage.
This shift in thinking is one of the most important outcomes of the conference. It signals that Ethiopians are beginning to move from confrontation toward cooperation.
To me, the eight agenda issues also reveal how deeply interconnected Ethiopiaโs challenges are. Questions of governance cannot be separated from questions of justice. Debates over federalism cannot be detached from questions of identity and representation. Electoral systems are tied to trust in institutions, and transitional justice is linked to healing historical wounds.
๐๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ง๐๐๐ญ๐๐, ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐๐ญ๐๐ง ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฉ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ. ๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ญ๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ, ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ซ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ฌ, ๐ซ๐๐๐จ๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ณ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ. ๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ, ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ญ๐ก ๐ญ๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.
Another important aspect of convergence is the role of expert input. I am privileged to be designated a subject matter expert in various areas. The role of experts is to help clarify technical matters, correct misunderstandings, and provide context that broadens the delegatesโ thinking. Their contribution allows the conference to move beyond slogans and toward practical solutions.
When delegates are better informed, they are more capable of finding durable agreements. This is especially important in a national dialogue, where the issues are complex and the consequences of poor decisions are serious. It is not the job of experts to shape opinions, present preferred solutions or try to influence the delegates directly or indirectly in one or more directions or outcomes.
The emergence of convergence at the conference also reflects a deeper civic lesson. It shows that democracy is not only about winning arguments. It is also about listening carefully, adjusting oneโs position, and building collective purpose.
In this sense, the dialogue conference is helping to cultivate a political culture based on reason, humility, and shared responsibility. Such a culture is essential for Ethiopiaโs future. Without it, divisions may persist. With it, the country can begin to heal and rebuild.
Ultimately, convergence on the eight agenda issues is not merely a procedural achievement. It is a symbol of national possibility. It demonstrates that Ethiopians, despite years of mistrust and conflict, are capable of reaching across differences and working toward a common future.
If this spirit continues, the National Dialogue Conference may become one of the most important turning points in Ethiopiaโs modern history. It can help lay the foundation for peace, justice, and a more inclusive political order.
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ ๐. ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ซ๐ ๐จ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ: ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐๐๐ฒโ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ซ๐จ๐ฐโ๐ฌ ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐.
๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ญ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ง ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฆ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐จ๐ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ฒ, ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐, ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ฉ๐ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐๐ญ๐ก ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ซ.
Posted originally on X (Twitter):
https://x.com/AlMariam1/status/2081944459789418658
Share this: