๐๐๐ฒ ๐- ๐
๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ฒ, ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐
Today, the groups of ten consolidated their positions on the agenda issues assigned to them for further discussion with their larger groups of fifty delegates. The dialogue has been organized in a layered structure: an initial phase of 10 x 5, followed by 50 x 5, then 250 x 2, 250 x 16, and finally 8 x 500, bringing the total number of delegates to approximately 4,000.
๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ. ๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐จ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐, ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ง ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ.
Over the course of three days, the groups of ten engaged in detailed discussions on each topic and subtopic within their respective agendas. There was no restriction on the presentation of ideas. Every delegate was given full opportunity to speak, reflect, and respond. The process was deliberately open, allowing participants to express themselves without pressure or artificial limitation.
All views expressed by individual delegates were recorded carefully, reformulated as declarative statements, and read back to them to ensure accuracy. These statements were then entered into the formal notebook provided by the Commission, and the groups elected rapporteurs to preserve the integrity of the record. Individual views were subsequently synthesized into statements of consensus, while dissenting opinions were preserved separately. This careful documentation reflects a deep respect for both agreement and disagreement, and for the democratic value of precision in public deliberation.
The Ethiopian National Dialogue is emerging as an extraordinary experiment in collective reasoning. The very word โdialogueโ comes from the Greek dialogos, meaning conversation, with roots in dia meaning โthroughโ and logos meaning โspeechโ or โreason.โ
๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐, ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ; ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ก, ๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ . ๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐จ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก. ๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ซ๐ฒ, ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐๐๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ฐ๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ. ๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ ๐.
I have had the privilege of participating in the Conference both as a delegate in group discussions and as an expert in subject-matter sessions. In both roles, I witnessed Conference delegates applying reason to the countryโs most difficult problems and possible solutions. They drew on personal experience, local wisdom, proverbs, scientific evidence, and statistical analysis. Some spoke from the authority of lived hardship; others contributed technical insight or historical perspective.
Together, these forms of knowledge enriched the discussion and made it more grounded, humane, and realistic. The result was not merely a conversation, but a genuine collective effort to understand Ethiopiaโs challenges in their full complexity.
The atmosphere during the discussions was notably calm, respectful, and attentive. Delegates listened carefully to one another. Very few arrived with rigid positions, and even fewer appeared unwilling to revise their views. Most showed a remarkable openness to persuasion, despite holding strong preexisting beliefs. They asked questions generously and with sincerity.
Through close listening, many developed empathy for the views of others, even where they did not fully agree. This quality of mutual attention gave the dialogue a rare and encouraging tone. It suggested that consensus was not being forced but being patiently built organically from within.
Many delegates changed or refined their positions after hearing expert presentations. This was one of the strongest signs that the dialogue is functioning as it should. Expert input is not intended to override delegate judgment, but to sharpen it, expand it, and help delegates distinguish between slogans and solutions. In a country facing deep institutional and historical questions, such informed adjustment is a strength, not a weakness. It shows a willingness to learn and a commitment to truth over posture.
Equally striking was the sense of personal responsibility delegates brought to their work. During meetings and even in coffee breaks, they reminded one another of the weight of their generational duty. They spoke often of the rarity of the opportunity before them and the need to do their very best in carrying out their responsibilities. Their conversations reflected goodwill, good faith, and trust in one anotherโs integrity.
Notably, they often used the language of collective belongingโโweโ and โourโโrather than the language of division. That subtle but powerful choice of words revealed to me a growing sense of shared ownership over Ethiopiaโs future.
Over these three days of dialogue, one could observe a quiet transformation. Delegates who arrived with broad and sometimes diffuse agendas gradually refined their thinking into more focused and workable proposals. This narrowing was not a loss, but a gain. It reflected the discipline of dialogue: the movement from every possible concern to the most urgent and actionable ones. It showed that when people reason together honestly, they can move from abstraction to clarity, from fragmentation to coherence.
As I listened to delegates, answered their questions as a subject-matter expert, and observed their interactions during sessions and coffee breaks, I was reminded of a profound line from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: โWe must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.โ
That message resonates deeply in Ethiopiaโs present moment. It speaks not only to coexistence, but to moral responsibility, humility, and the necessity of shared destiny. The dialogue conference is giving that principle a living form.
After three intense days of small-group deliberations, I am left with a strong conviction: Ethiopians can and will live together in peace as brothers and sisters. The wisdom, patience, and seriousness displayed by the delegates suggest that national renewal and reconciliation is not just possible but foreordained by the Almighty.
As a Conference participant, observer and subject matter expert over the past three days of intense dialogue and deliberations of the small groups of ten, I am convinced that we Ethiopians shall live together as brothers and sisters because we live in the โland of the wiseโ and are determined to ensure โEthiopia Shall Riseโ just as Ghanaโs first president Kwame Nkruma predicted in his poem by the same title in 1963, at the founding of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in Addis Ababa, and become “Africa’s Destiny.”
โ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐โ (๐๐ฐ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ค๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ก)
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐, ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐ ๐๐ฆ
Set high among the verdant hills
That gave birth to the unfailing
Waters of the Nile
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐, ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฌ๐;
Ethiopia, bold cradle of Africaโs ancient rule
And fertile school
Of our African culture;
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฌ๐ย ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐
And remould with us the full figure
Of Africaโs hopes
And destiny.
๐๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐.
Originally posted on X:
https://x.com/AlMariam1/status/2080839769030885424
๐๐๐ฒ ๐- ๐ ๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ฒ, ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐, ๐๐๐๐
Today, the groups of ten consolidated their positions on the agenda issues assigned to them for further discussion with their larger groups of fifty delegates. The dialogue has been organized in a layered structure: an initial phase of 10 x 5, followed by 50 x 5, then 250 x 2, 250 x 16, and finally 8 x 500, bringing the total number of delegates to approximately 4,000.
๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ก ๐๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ. ๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐จ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ซ๐, ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ง ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ฏ๐๐ซ๐ฒ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ ๐๐๐ซ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ง๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ.
Over the course of three days, the groups of ten engaged in detailed discussions on each topic and subtopic within their respective agendas. There was no restriction on the presentation of ideas. Every delegate was given full opportunity to speak, reflect, and respond. The process was deliberately open, allowing participants to express themselves without pressure or artificial limitation.
All views expressed by individual delegates were recorded carefully, reformulated as declarative statements, and read back to them to ensure accuracy. These statements were then entered into the formal notebook provided by the Commission, and the groups elected rapporteurs to preserve the integrity of the record. Individual views were subsequently synthesized into statements of consensus, while dissenting opinions were preserved separately. This careful documentation reflects a deep respect for both agreement and disagreement, and for the democratic value of precision in public deliberation.
The Ethiopian National Dialogue is emerging as an extraordinary experiment in collective reasoning. The very word โdialogueโ comes from the Greek dialogos, meaning conversation, with roots in dia meaning โthroughโ and logos meaning โspeechโ or โreason.โ
๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐, ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฑ๐๐ก๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ; ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ๐จ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ก, ๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ . ๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ๐จ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ฌ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก ๐ฐ๐ก๐ข๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก. ๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐ซ๐ฒ, ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ซ๐๐๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ฐ๐๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ. ๐ ๐๐ฆ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฌ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ ๐.
I have had the privilege of participating in the Conference both as a delegate in group discussions and as an expert in subject-matter sessions. In both roles, I witnessed Conference delegates applying reason to the countryโs most difficult problems and possible solutions. They drew on personal experience, local wisdom, proverbs, scientific evidence, and statistical analysis. Some spoke from the authority of lived hardship; others contributed technical insight or historical perspective.
Together, these forms of knowledge enriched the discussion and made it more grounded, humane, and realistic. The result was not merely a conversation, but a genuine collective effort to understand Ethiopiaโs challenges in their full complexity.
The atmosphere during the discussions was notably calm, respectful, and attentive. Delegates listened carefully to one another. Very few arrived with rigid positions, and even fewer appeared unwilling to revise their views. Most showed a remarkable openness to persuasion, despite holding strong preexisting beliefs. They asked questions generously and with sincerity.
Through close listening, many developed empathy for the views of others, even where they did not fully agree. This quality of mutual attention gave the dialogue a rare and encouraging tone. It suggested that consensus was not being forced but being patiently built organically from within.
Many delegates changed or refined their positions after hearing expert presentations. This was one of the strongest signs that the dialogue is functioning as it should. Expert input is not intended to override delegate judgment, but to sharpen it, expand it, and help delegates distinguish between slogans and solutions. In a country facing deep institutional and historical questions, such informed adjustment is a strength, not a weakness. It shows a willingness to learn and a commitment to truth over posture.
Equally striking was the sense of personal responsibility delegates brought to their work. During meetings and even in coffee breaks, they reminded one another of the weight of their generational duty. They spoke often of the rarity of the opportunity before them and the need to do their very best in carrying out their responsibilities. Their conversations reflected goodwill, good faith, and trust in one anotherโs integrity.
Notably, they often used the language of collective belongingโโweโ and โourโโrather than the language of division. That subtle but powerful choice of words revealed to me a growing sense of shared ownership over Ethiopiaโs future.
Over these three days of dialogue, one could observe a quiet transformation. Delegates who arrived with broad and sometimes diffuse agendas gradually refined their thinking into more focused and workable proposals. This narrowing was not a loss, but a gain. It reflected the discipline of dialogue: the movement from every possible concern to the most urgent and actionable ones. It showed that when people reason together honestly, they can move from abstraction to clarity, from fragmentation to coherence.
As I listened to delegates, answered their questions as a subject-matter expert, and observed their interactions during sessions and coffee breaks, I was reminded of a profound line from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: โWe must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.โ
That message resonates deeply in Ethiopiaโs present moment. It speaks not only to coexistence, but to moral responsibility, humility, and the necessity of shared destiny. The dialogue conference is giving that principle a living form.
After three intense days of small-group deliberations, I am left with a strong conviction: Ethiopians can and will live together in peace as brothers and sisters. The wisdom, patience, and seriousness displayed by the delegates suggest that national renewal and reconciliation is not just possible but foreordained by the Almighty.
As a Conference participant, observer and subject matter expert over the past three days of intense dialogue and deliberations of the small groups of ten, I am convinced that we Ethiopians shall live together as brothers and sisters because we live in the โland of the wiseโ and are determined to ensure โEthiopia Shall Riseโ just as Ghanaโs first president Kwame Nkruma predicted in his poem by the same title in 1963, at the founding of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in Addis Ababa, and become “Africa’s Destiny.”
โ๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐โ (๐๐ฐ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ค๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐๐ก)
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐, ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐โ๐ฌ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ ๐ ๐๐ฆ
Set high among the verdant hills
That gave birth to the unfailing
Waters of the Nile
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐, ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฌ๐;
Ethiopia, bold cradle of Africaโs ancient rule
And fertile school
Of our African culture;
๐๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฌ๐ย ๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐
And remould with us the full figure
Of Africaโs hopes
And destiny.
๐๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐.
Originally posted on X:
https://x.com/AlMariam1/status/2080839769030885424
Share this: