The New Press Law
Originally appeared in Ethiopian Review Magazine November 1992
http://www.ethiopianreview.com/1992/Article_AlemayehuGMNov92.html
 
The Council of Representatives of the Transitional Government of Ethiopia last month approved a “Press Law” authorizing government officials to exercise sweeping censorship powers over the press and persons associated with the press. This law is unnecessary and unduly burdensome on the traditional and universal functions of a free press.
 
The “Press Law” covers both the print and electronic media. Any means used for mass dissemination of information is considered “press” and any person involved in the dissemination of information is considered a “journalist” within the meaning of the law. The press is required to submit its publication for approval to a local or national censor who will determine whether the particular publication passes a test of subversiveness. Appeal may be taken to a judicial body. However, the burden of proving that the publication is not subversive or will not contribute to “illegality” or “social and ethnic conflict” is placed on the press.
 
Those of us who are in the press have basic concerns about the “Press Law.” First, the law criminalizes the ordinary and legitimate functions of the press to report on important and legitimate issues of public concern. It is impossible for the press to legally prove whether an article in a publication will contribute to “social or ethnic conflict” at some point in the future.
 
Second, the law creates a hostile and chilling environment for the free exchange of ideas. Anyone writing for a publication, including those writing letters to the editor, may be subject to criminal prosecution if the government censor arbitrarily determines that the piece of writing is subversive or contributes to “social or ethnic conflict.”
 
Third, the law is ultimately intended to stifle any criticism of government policy or expressions of disagreement with the government. Under the new law, for instance, critical analyses of the Transitional Government’s policy of ethnic enclaves would expose both the publication and the writer to criminal liability. This is intolerable and unacceptable.
 
A free press is a cornerstone of democratic liberties. A free press is a watchdog against government tyranny and corruption; it is the primary means by which society learns about the performance of public officials and institutions. No society can claim or aspire to be democratic if it imposes arbitrary and undue burdens on the functions of the press.
 
The importance of a free press has been amply demonstrated in the experience of the most enduring democracies. A medium for the transplantation of proven democratic values and experiences to Ethiopia is desirable and very much in need.
 
History shows that when the bell tolls for the free press, it tolls for free speech, the right to petition government, the right to assemble…
____________________________________________________
Alemayehu G. Mariam, Ph.D., J.D., is Senior Editor of ER. He teaches constitutional and international law at California State University and maintains a law practice in Beverly Hills, California.
 

 

About

Professor Alemayehu G. Mariam teaches political science at California State University, San Bernardino. His teaching areas include American constitutional law, civil rights law, judicial process, American and California state governments, and African politics. He has published two volumes on American constitutional law, including American Constitutional Law: Structures and Process (1994) and American Constitutional Law: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights (1998). He is the Senior Editor of the International Journal of Ethiopian Studies, a leading scholarly journal on Ethiopia. For the last several years, Prof. Mariam has written weekly web commentaries on Ethiopian human rights and African issues that are widely read online. He played a central advocacy role in the passage of H.R. 2003 (Ethiopia Democracy and Accountability Act of 2007) in the House of Representatives in 2007. Prof. Mariam practices in the areas of criminal defense and civil litigation. In 1998, he argued a major case in the California Supreme Court involving the right against self-incrimination in People v. Peevy, 17 Cal. 4th 1184, which helped clarify longstanding Miranda rights issues in criminal procedure in California. For several years, Prof. Mariam had a weekly public channel public affairs television show in Southern California called “In the Public Interest”. Prof. Mariam received his Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1984, and his J.D. from the University of Maryland in 1988.